That depends on his or her knowledge of the individual author, as well as what one can typically expect of a 15-year-old who is engaged in writing a narrative account of social differences in a historical context. Drawing together the various aspects of linguistic knowledge required of the teacher, we see from the above that at least the following aspects are relevant: punctuation and its relationship with meaning use of pronouns structure of phrase and sentence, including choice of verb tenses and. Page 36 Of course, a teacher possessing the kinds of knowledge listed would still need a good deal more, including a developing understanding of individual pupils' tendencies, weaknesses and strengths, a clear notion of the place of the exercise in an overall teaching scheme, the. It is not only in the area of linguistic form that the teacher's knowledge about language is applicable. Extending and refining vocabulary is central to development throughout the whole school age-range, and this can be made more effective by knowing about the lexical relationships of English. One way of applying such knowledge could be by exploring with pupils such matters as synonymy: with younger children it may be profitable to consider how, for example, smallness can best be expressed in different contexts - just when one might or might not use. Indeed, explicit attention to words and their meanings should be integral to English teaching throughout school life. In one secondary classroom we visited, the class encountered the word 'selfless'. None of the pupils could guess needed what it meant and a discussion followed without recourse to a dictionary, which left the meaning of the word obscure.
It may be obvious that in this context the report latter meaning is intended, but the next time the pupil uses it it may not be so clear, and so the potential ambiguity is worth pointing out. The use of the word moan is also ambiguous. If moan is taken literally, we are to understand that people made low-pitched sounds of distress; again, in the particular context it is obviously more likely to mean simply complain. In this extract, a colloquial synonym for complain has been used in a context where stylistically a non-colloquial synonym is required. If we are to encourage children to use language with precision and care, the possible clashes of meaning should be made explicit. The extract as a whole, then, shows a command of Standard English, but has a number of weaknesses. The teacher must decide what to comment on and the extent to which technical terms would be useful.
In the first sentence the pronoun they, although syntactically referring to people in line 1, is obviously meant to refer to people of a former age. Possibly because of a confusion caused by the misuse of the pronouns, the form had eaten in line 3 should have read 'used to eat'. In the second sentence, if the given punctuation is retained, then is should have been was, and start should have been started. So, either the punctuation or the tense choice is wrong. At a different level, the use of today in line 1 requires a second and contrasting temporal adverb after in in one day (especially in view of the word repetition involved in the choice of in one day rather than 'in 24 hours or 'during. There is a potential ambiguity in the use of once in line. 'Once' can mean either 'on one particular occasion or 'as soon as depending on its syntactic function.
Ofs hodon n - okresn fotbalov svaz
A contrasting example is given by a 15-year-old's account of something interesting learned in a history lesson. The theme of the lesson had concerned nutrition at the time of the industrial revolution. But what people eat to day is about 4 times as what they had eaten in one day and once they asked what is for dinner and the reply is potatoes they start to moan (Brian) The committee does not offer this example of Brian's. What people would notice first about this (or any) text is the orthographic shapes - the spelling, the punctuation, the general layout. In this instance, there are two things to notice. The spelling is unexceptionable: the punctuation deviates from standard analysis usage in two respects. There is no full stop after had eaten in one day (though the following word, and begins with a capital letter) and there are no"tion marks (or 'speech marks around what is for dinner (the phrase should conformably have reporting been written 'What is for.
and potatoes (as 'potatoes!(. Either that, or the tense forms are wrong (see below). It may be that a teacher would regard these as merely careless omissions. There is nothing amiss with the word structure: it is clear that the pupil can inflect participles ( eaten ) and can form plurals ( potatoes though the word choices are very simple, with only three words requiring any kind of modification from the simple. However, when we begin to look at the phrase and sentence structure, there is more to comment. First, the tense forms have gone awry.
Her spelling errors show that she has begun to comprehend the patterns of English spelling. But this is the work of a 7-year-old. As Ann progresses she will learn about the placing of full stops. She will see how events can be given different prominence by varying the sentence pattern - 'we went up Mud Lane where we saw Sugar'. Building on what the child already grasps, the teacher will help her forward, perhaps initially by encouraging a second draft with some restructuring of her narrative.
Such guidance will draw upon and extend Ann's discernible practice, starting from what she can achieve, not from an externally imposed notion of development enforced by a course book and its drills. We cannot say how many improving techniques Ann might assimilate at once, but making some of them will contribute directly to her writing development. Sadly, the hmi survey. Primary Education in England (1978,. 50) found that 'in only about a third of the classes were samples of children's written work regularly used to monitor their progress' and that 'in fewer than half of the classes was children's own written work used as a basis for teaching spelling, syntax. Example ii: a 15-year-old.
Download Last 15 years Compulsory English Papers for
Example i: a 7 -year-old. If children's writing is to develop, we must discern their strengths as well as their weaknesses. Here is a record of a simple experience by a girl aged. Yesterday we went out for walk and we walked over some bridges pdf and we saw some workmen and we went passed our house and Mrs Brown said that our garden was nice and we crossed the riverban and we went up mud lane and. Ann has a vivid way with narrative. Her account moves irresistibly forward. She already has some grasp of sentence variation - ' when we came back it was playtime.'. She uses capitals properly for the obvious proper nouns (. Mrs Brown, joanne but not for what may be in her perception common nouns ( sugar, mud lane ).
Is it clear who the participants are - is 'the referent' in each case clearly identified? Would it be clearer to use a richer 'adjective' or a different 'noun'? Is there 'a sentence' which seems to be too long - what makes it too long and how might the problem be remedied? Is there 'a paragraph' which is too long - what makes it too long and what makes you decide to break a paragraph in one place rather than another? Is there an expression which jars, which does not seem to fit in very well - is there 'a synonym' which would suit this type of writing better? If the writing is a rather repetitive account of a football match, would it be brightened by putting in some description of the crowd, or the day, or the field - where would the description best go? It essay is hard for all of us to see the faults of what we have just written unless we can leave the writing alone for a time, and then come back to it with fresh eyes. The teacher page 34 will rarely have time to work in detail with each pupil on the improvement of a piece of writing: the neighbouring pupil, however, can be an ideal editor as long as this pupil knows how to respond with constructive advice that. If the teacher is to help children to improve their skills in reading, or in speaking, it will not be sufficient for the teacher alone to he aware of the formal and functional characteristics of different types of language use: the pupils must share this.
a teacher. The use of language to clarify one's own feelings and thought, the kind of fumbling, tentative groping for meaning, is of utmost importance in school learning, as it is throughout life. Pedagogically, it is important for the teacher to be able to distinguish and accept such tentative language as a stage on the path to clearer expression. In this area there is now a welcome tendency in English lessons towards, for example, redrafting, when written work, after discussion, is re-worked and improved, as are many important pieces of writing in later life (although rewriting can become a dull and ill-understood exercise unless. For the discussion of the first draft to be helpful, teacher and pupil need to be able to use a shared vocabulary for talking about writing. There is much more to writing than spelling and punctuation. Is it clear, in general, what the writer is writing about - is 'the topic' clearly identified?
Page 33, chapter 4, teacher and pupil: The model in use. It is the purpose of this chapter to illustrate the relevance of the language model to English teaching throughout the school age-range and beyond. By giving illustration of classroom activities, we shall the get closer to answering the question: 'how does all this help the teacher and, through the teacher, the children and our future adult population?'. Children arrive at their first school able to use at least their own spoken language. But this ability varies widely from child to child. The best start for a pre-school child is where parents and others attend to what the child is saying to them and respond appropriately; where parents and children talk to each other in some kind of shared enterprise; where the child is increasingly encouraged. Young children's verbal abilities are stretched and made more flexible by challenge and involvement, by new and different contexts and circumstances for talk. But we are well aware that not all homes are part of such a world.
Pohela, boishakh, wishes - bengali new year"s
Change, it wasn't trendy, funny, nor was it coined. Twitter, but we thought change told a real story about how hippie our users defined 2010. Unlike in 2008, change was no longer a campaign slogan. But, the term still held a lot of weight. Here's an excerpt from our. Word of the year announcement in 2010 : The national debate can arguably be summarized by the question: In the past two years, has there been enough change? Has there been too much? Meanwhile, many Americans continue to face change in their homes, bank accounts and jobs. Only time will tell if the latest wave of change Americans voted for in the midterm elections will result in a negative or positive outcome.